+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Ventilation Basics, part two

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    St. Cloud, Minnesota
    Posts
    1,720

    Default Ventilation Basics, part two

    Part Two, Doing the Numbers
    Ok. We’ve talked about the basics, now let’s take a look at some basic design issues.

    Exhaust System Design

    So, where do we start? Well, let’s talk first about a couple of important numbers and calculations that have to be made first.

    CFM: Cubic Feet per Minute. The amount of air that a ventilation system can move. It is based on how much air a given fan can move against a given amount of pressure.

    Velocity: The speed the air moves inside the duct. It is measured in Feet per Minute.

    Velocity Pressure: The pressure created by trying to force air at a given Velocity through a given duct size.

    SP: Static Pressure. The total pressure against which the fan moves air. SP increases as the size of the duct decreases, with the addition of bends, and with any amount of turbulence. As SP increases, the efficiency of the fan to move air goes down, or, to state it differently, the higher the SP, the lower the CFM from design.

    Loss Factor: A multiplier, usually fractional, that is the amount of friction induced by ducts. This is number is a constant for specific duct types and is usually presented in a look up chart form. The chart we will be using in all these calculations can be found in the posting “Ventilation 101: Static Pressure” (insert link here), referred to below as Table 1.

    Each one of these numbers or calculations factors into the design of an exhaust system. I will present several different designs to show how each affects the total design.

    The first item that we need to know is what size fan (in CFM) we need for our design. The American Conference on Governmental Industrial Hygiene (ACGIH) published its Recommended Practices for Ventilation. In the 22nd edition, 1995, it states a variety of processes that require ventilation. Among those, the nearest to our specific process is Restaurant Hoods (over cook tops). The Practice states that for Wall Mounted hoods, the recommended air flow is 80 CFM per square foot of hood area (length times width). For Island type (or ceiling hung) hoods, the recommended air flow is 125 CFM per square foot of hood area.

    These flow differences (80 CFM versus 125 CFM) are important because they take into account the total air flow in a given room. A wall mounted or bench mounted workstation hood will take air only from the local area, whereas a ceiling mounted hood will affect the entire room.

    Example: Ceiling mounted hood, 4 feet wide by 2 feet deep. Per the Recommended Practices, the CFM requirement for this hood would be 4 x 2 x 125, or 1000 CFM.

    Example: Wall or bench workstation mounted hood, 4 feet wide by 3 feet deep (or high – if you use a bench mounted workstation hood with sides that extend down to the table top, measure the height of the opening). 4 x 3 x 80, or 960 CFM.

    As you can see, this calculation does not take into account the type or size of the torch you may be using because it is not necessary, if you use the ACGIH recommendations. What drives the calculations, as you can see, is the size of your hood. This can be easily calculated by measuring how much space you want to cover with your hood.

    You should also note that these numbers as shown are for standard air density and do need to be adjusted for such things as high temperature (90 degrees or more), high moisture content (high humidity areas), as well as elevation in excess of 1500 feet above sea level.

    Another important factor to designing a good ventilation system is the flow rate or Velocity. Low velocity air movement will not convey fumes or particulates. High velocity air movement is very noisy. Somewhere between the two is a delicate balance between moving fumes and particulates and noise.

    ACGIH (as noted above) has another Recommended Practice that we need to look at: “Minimum Duct Velocities for Conveying Materials”.

    Very fine light dust: 2500 to 3000 FPM (Feet per Minute)
    Dry Dusts and Powders: 3000 to 4000 FPM
    Average Industrial Dust: 3500 to 4000 FPM

    For our purposes as glassworkers, we should be using duct velocities in the range of 2500 to 3000 FPM. If you do a substantial amount of work with frit or enamel, you should consider a system that moves between 3000 and 3500 FPM.

    Design Criteria

    The very first thing you need to determine is what type of hood arrangement you are going to have. This is a very individual, studio-based decision, and it should be made on the basis of how much space you have and what your individual layout looks like. This will vary from studio to studio depending on window and door locations, and access to outside walls.

    Next, we need the basic formulas, or what are known as the Fan Laws.

    Formula 1: CFM = Area (of ductwork) multiplied times Velocity (of the moving air) multiplied by the Loss Factor

    We usually know CFM and ductwork size, so to solve for Velocity, divide CFM by Area.

    Formula 2: VP (Velocity Pressure) = (Velocity / 4004) squared

    Formula 3: Bend Loss Factor = Quantity times VP times 0.125 (for a 90 degree bend, for a 45 degree bend use 0.0625)

    Formula 4: SP = VP times length of duct run times Loss Factor (from Table 1) plus Bend Loss Factor

    Example 1:

    CFM = 1300
    Duct size = 6” round (or .196 square feet) Use the area of a circle formula (Pi times radius squared) divided by 144.

    Total run = 6 feet.

    Number of Bends: 0

    Loss Factor: 0.11 (from Table 1)

    Solve for Velocity: 1300 / .196 = 6632 Feet per Minute

    Solve for VP: (6632/4004) squared = 2.74

    Solve for SP: 2.74 times 6 times .11 = 1.80 inches of pressure

    Example 2:

    Fan Size: 1300 CFM

    Duct Size: 8” (or .349 square feet)

    Total Run: 6 feet

    Number of Bends: 0

    Loss Factor (from Table 1): 0.025

    Solve for Velocity: 1300 / .349 = 3725 FPM

    Solve for VP = (3725/4004) squared = .865

    Solve for SP: .865 times 6 times 0.025 = 0.129 inches

    Notice that the only thing that changed between Example 1 and Example 2 was the size of the duct. In Example 1, the duct size was 6 inches. This resulted in a static pressure of 1.80 inches and a velocity of 6632 FPM. In Example 2, the duct size was 8”, resulting in a static pressure of .129 inches and a velocity of 3725 inches.

    These two examples show the importance of sizing your ducts to achieve the best performance of your exhaust system. By varying the size of the duct, you can lower static pressure and velocity in order to achieve as near as possible to your planned design. You can also adjust the system to meet the requirements of a particular fan.

    Example 3:

    Fan Size: 1300 CFM

    Duct Size: 8” (or .349 square feet)

    Total Run: 10 Feet

    Loss Factor: 0.025

    Total number of 90 degree bends: 3

    The difference between Example 2 and Example 3 is the longer run and the 3 additional bends that have been added to the system.

    Solve for Loss Factor: 3 times .865 x 0.13 = .337

    Solve for SP: .865 times 10 times .025 = .214 plus .337 = .551 inches

    Sample Exhaust System 1

    For the purposes of this example, we will use a bench mounted hood with the following measurements: 36” wide by 20” deep (very similar to a kitchen exhaust hood). 36 x 20 = 720 square inches divided by 144 (to get square feet) is 5. The hood coverage area is 5 square feet. Multiply this times 80 (per the discussion above) and your result is 400 CFM. The hood is going to be 10 feet from the exhaust wall, and will need two 90 degree bends.

    Using the formulas above, a 400 CFM fan in a 4” duct produces over 4500 FPM of velocity, way too much. A 6” duct provides 2000 FPM, a bare minimum needed. A 5” duct gives us 2900 FPM, perfect for what we need.

    Per the formulas above, the total SP for this particular system will be 0.38 inches.

    If you grab your handy Grainger book and look at the blower (fans) section, you will see the following fans will meet the needed 400 CFM at .4 inches of static pressure: 4C455 and 4C870. Both of these fans will generate 495 CFM at 0.0” of SP and 416 CFM at 0.4” of SP.

    This method of fan selection will guarantee that you will get the needed air movement for your situation.

    Sample Exhaust System 2

    For the purposes of this example, we will use a ceiling mounted hood with the following dimensions: 4 feet wide by 6 feet long. 4 x 6 = 24 square feet. Multiply this time 125 (per the discussion above) and your result is 3000 CFM. The total run from the center of the hood to the outside wall is 15 feet, there will be one 90 degree bend.

    With this amount of air being moved, you have a couple of choices. You can use one single large fan, which will probably be mounted outside, or you can use two or three smaller sized fans. The advantage of using multiple smaller fans is that you can “zone” the hood, so that if you are only using one or two torches in one area, you only need to turn on the fan that is covering that particular area. You do have to be careful to design the hood so that it can be zoned, being sure that there are baffles in place to separate each section of the hood for each fan, otherwise the entire hood would act as a drawing area and the fan would lose suction efficiency for removing fumes.

    For this particular example, I’ll design it with one single fan and with 3 individual fans.

    Example A – one fan design.

    For a single fan design, in order to get the static pressure to a reasonable number, a 14 inch diameter duct will have to be used. This will have to be supplied by a HVAC contractor.

    The numbers for this design are:

    CFM: 3000
    Velocity: 2800 FPM
    Static Pressure: .22 Inches

    From the Grainger catalog, there are a number of choices:

    Axial direct drive downblast exhaust ventilators: 4YC52: 3109 at .25 inches, etc.
    Centrifugal belt drive downblast exhaust ventilators: 7A561: 3040 at .25 inches, etc.
    Centrifugal in-line duct blower: 7F678: 3395 at .25 inches, etc.
    Belt drive tubeaxial fans: 7F939: 3045 at .25 inches, etc.

    This type of exhaust system should be professionally installed, due to the size and weight of the individual components. I don’t advocate doing this particular design yourself!

    Example B – three fan design.


    For a three fan design, be sure that the hood is evenly divided with interior baffles. Each section should duct directly in the center of the hood section. The duct size will be 8”

    The numbers are:

    CFM: 1000
    Velocity: 2800 FPM
    Static Pressure: .37 Inches.

    From the Grainger catalog, again a number of choices:

    Permanent Split Capacitor Blower: 4C831: 1175 CFM at .50 inches.
    In-line duct blowers: 7H713: 1040 CFM at .37 inches

    Remember, you will need 3 of each fan (they should be identical).

    This particular example also presents us with a problem. When the system is running at full capacity, it will be exhausting 3000 plus cubic feet per minute of air. This is a huge amount of air, and it will have a very definite effect on the temperature of the air inside the studio, especially during the winter and summer months. Because, not only are we exhausting 3000 cubic feet per minute of air, but we are also bring in 3000 cubic feet per minute of fresh outside air. Let’s say the room is 20 feet by 20 feet with 10 foot high ceilings. This is a total space of 4000 cubic feet. We will be completely changing the air in the room every 1.33 minutes. If the temperature outside is -10 degrees, you can imagine that the room temperature is going to fall very quickly.
    So, what do we do? There are a couple of options. First, we can temper, or pre-heat or pre-cool the air before it is emptied into the room. This can get very expensive very quickly. Basically, you need a furnace/air conditioner that has the BTU capacity to handle 3000 CFM at the temperature extremes for your location. The fresh air intake is routed through what would normally be used as the cold air return on a normal furnace and the heating/cooling ducts would dump out into the studio room. The furnace/air conditioner would be running full blast 100% of the time to keep up with the air flow requirements. Clearly, in the dead of winter or the height of a hot humid summer, this is not an approach I would advocate.

    A far better solution is to direct the make up air to where it is being used: the work table. Run oversize, insulated ducting to underneath the work table. Run individual ducts, as large as possible up into the table top. As the exhaust system removes air, it will be pulled directly up from the table top duct openings, creating a curtain of air that will further enhance the removal of fumes and particulates.

    NOTE: Table 1, referred to above, can be found here: http://www.artglassforum.com/forums/...ead.php?t=1357

    ****************
    Note: the table shows FL, this is also called the loss factor, and it is shown per 100 feet of duct run. To find the FL per foot, simply divide by 100.
    ****************


    NOTE: This document is copyright (C) 2006 by Michael Aurelius. Permission is hereby given to members of ISGB Forum to use and reproduce this document for their own use only. This document may not be reproduced on any other website or forum without express written permission by the author.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    121

    Default

    you never have enough.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Hi Mike,
    As a beginning glass bead maker I found the first two parts of your article about ventilation basics valuable and interesting. I'm wondering when part three might be posted since my hubby is going to build me a vent hood for my workstation.
    Thanks,
    Lyn

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    St. Cloud, Minnesota
    Posts
    1,720

    Default

    Should be fairly soon. I had to wait until I got my studio up and running and stuff out of storage.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2

    Smile

    Thanks for the quick reply Mike. I'll certainly be watching out for part 3. I am a real newbie and before I actually begin making glass beads I want to be sure to have proper ventilation at my work station. I spent some time browsing pictures of peoples studios and was surprised at some of the ventilation systems or lack thereof.
    Anyhow, thanks again,
    Lyn

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    St. Cloud, Minnesota
    Posts
    1,720

    Default

    Yeah, I know. It is a "problem". Part of it is because of the lack of good information, some of it is from some of the bad information that was floating around until recently, some is from lack of funds (a good ventilation system is not cheap!), and some of it is just plain "I don't care".

    I won't hazard any guesses on percentage splits, and those are just my observations of course, and probably have nothing to do with 'real life'.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Western Washington State
    Posts
    3,679

    Default

    This is all very useful.

    I'd add that when whatever system one has designed is implemented, one must be prepared to obtain measurements of actual performance. It is the actual performance that counts, not whatever the designers have, in their experience and infinite wisdom, calculated or extracted from the handbooks. It is, after all, by measuring "as built" systems that the models and handbooks have been developed.

    Mind you, I am not discounting any of the above discussion, merely adding the final step of verifiying the results by careful measurements. Any measurement that serves to confirm the performance, however crude, is better than no measurement at all.

    BTW, the ACGIH manual on Industrial Ventilation is now up to the 26th edition as of 2007, not that there have been massive changes since the 25th edition. It's a standard handbook that should be in every designer's library, among others. There are other ACGIH publications that are issued annually, and those are also "must haves" for designers of industrial systems.

    Vince

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts